Wireless Emergency Alerts on Your Mobile Device

CTIA-The Wireless Association® and the wireless industry joined the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to offer Americans a robust and reliable wireless emergency alert system.

Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA), also known as Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS) or Personal Localized Alerting Network (PLAN), is a national emergency alert system to send concise, text-like messages to users’ WEA-capable mobile devices starting April 2012. Wireless providers representing nearly 97 percent of subscribers are participating in distributing wireless emergency alerts.

Mobile users will not be charged for receiving these text-like alerts and are automatically enrolled to receive them.

There are three different kinds of alerts:
Presidential Alerts – Alerts issued by the President or a designee;
Imminent Threat Alerts – Alerts that include severe man-made or natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, etc., where an imminent threat to life or property exists; and
AMBER Alerts – Alerts that meet the U.S. Department of Justice’s criteria to help law enforcement search for and locate an abducted child.

Douglas Hansen, Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention at From Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, had this to say "We should be using today's technology to keep the public aware of any dangerous conditions. This is a good first step, however, at this time, I'm not sure if there is an opt out provision. We have found, with our reverse 911 system, some people do not want to receive emergency messages, for whatever reason."

From the FEMA site:  WEA are not the same as text messages. WEA will not have to be opened like SMS text messages, but will “pop up” on the device’s screen. A key differentiator between the CMAS/WEA capability and the existing Short Message Service Point-to-Point (SMS-PP)--a one-to-one or one-to-few alerting service--is that WEA uses SMS-Cell Broadcast (SMS-CB), a one-to-many service, which simultaneously delivers messages to multiple recipients in a specified area. By using SMS-CB as the delivery technology service, WEAs avoid the congestion issues currently experienced by traditional SMS-PP alerting services, which translates into faster and more comprehensive delivery of messages during times of emergency

From The Huffinton Post:

The weather warnings will include tornadoes, hurricanes, typhoons, tsunamis, flash floods, extreme winds, blizzards and ice and dust storms. Designers were concerned about overloading users with too much information, so they deliberately limited the messages to warnings, not watches, and excluded severe thunderstorm warnings, weather service spokeswoman Susan Buchanan said.

Wireless carriers serving almost 97 percent of U.S. subscribers have agreed to participate, including the biggest nationwide companies – AT&T Inc., Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel Corp. and T-Mobile USA. Each of the four offers at least some phones capable of receiving emergency alerts, with more on the way.

Sprint, Verizon and T-Mobile say they offer the service nationwide. AT&T only offers it in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Portland, Ore., at the moment. Spokesman Michael Balmoris said the company will add additional markets over time but declined to say which ones or when.

What do you think about this?

Municipalities use 'cost recovery fees' to pay for first response
By JULIANNE MATTERA
| Times Herald

Wreck your car, suffer a house fire — be misfortune’s favorite in most St. Clair County communities and your expenses don’t end with paying an insurance deductible.Of 32 municipalities contacted by the Times Herald, 26 have some form of what’s called a cost-recovery fee allowing them to charge to recoup costs for fire departments responding to fires, emergency responses and traffic crashes.

Some even charge for police response in certain instances.

Mark Bell, 26, of Marine City said people pay taxes for fire and police protection.

“I feel that it’s not right by any means especially if you pay your taxes,” he said.

Bill Worthen, 61, of Algonac agreed.

“It’s like a double taxation,” Worthen said.

But he said he understood where municipalities were coming from.

“Everybody’s scraping for money,” Worthen said. “They’re trying to get whatever they can.”

That’s the rationale behind most cost-recovery ordinances. Berlin Township Supervisor Bill Winn, for example, said the township had never considered such an ordinance — until a fatal single-vehicle crash in April 2011 sucked a “good sum of money” from the township’s funds.

He said 13 Berlin Township firefighters spent seven hours looking for a man missing from the crash scene on Belle River Road near Berville Road. The man they were looking for, a 22-year-old man from Allenton, had fled the scene.

Winn tried to recoup some of the costs, but learned the township needed a cost-recovery ordinance.

“Our fire department said it’s the worst accident they’ve ever seen,” Winn said. “That’s the reason we have a cost-recovery ordinance now.”

The township passed the ordinance in November. It specifically covers fees for crashes that are drug- or alcohol-related, Winn said.

Some municipalities use cost-recovery ordinances to fund fire departments. Others use it aso residents don’t wind up paying for fires and accidents vcaused by non-residents.

Still others enacted a cost-recovery ordinance to increase revenue needed to keep up with the rising cost of providing services.

Joe Thesing, assistant vice president for state affairs at the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, said municipalities in at least 27 states have considered or adopted accident response fee ordinances for police and/or fire response. There have been talks about the fees in 34 states.A total of 13 states have passed legislation prohibiting the collection of accident response fees. States where the practice is banned are Missouri, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Georgia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Florida, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Alabama, Utah, Arizona and Kansas.

Thesing said people in general don’t like accident response fees. Citing a Harris Interactive Poll, Thesing said the majority of Americans think their taxes should pay for the cost of public safety services provided by police and fire departments responding to vehicle crashes. The poll found 76% of adults believe additional accident response fees charged by local governments are not necessary.

“They believe the taxes they’re paying should cover these services,” Thesing said.

Michael LaFaive, director of fiscal policy for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy in Midland, said the cost response fees could be good or bad depending on how they’re used by the municipality. He said the extra fees could be a “tax by another name” if police and fire serivces in municipalities are paid through by taxes already.

But he said the extra fees could be good if they thwart over-consumption of services.

Clay Township Clerk Lisa White said her township adopted a cost-recovery ordinance in July of 2010. The ordinance specifically deals with nonresidents, and mainly was because of the amount of resources the township dedicates to the annual Jobbie Nooner party on Lake St. Clair.

“We’re not trying to nickel and dime our citizens,” White said. “... It was really costing the taxpayers quite a bit to just do this one event that wasn’t even sanctioned.”

In Marine City, people charged with accident response fees must be involved in a vehicle crash or have an incident at their home more than once in the same calendar year, Assistant Fire Chief Richard Tucker said.

A China Township man who crashed into a telephone pole on Parker Street was not charged for the incident Wednesday. Tucker said that was because it was the man’s first vehicle crash in the city this year.

Contact Julianne Mattera  Follow her on Twitter @jumattera.

--
Sherry Wood 104wood@gmail.com 810.479.2223 www.hub911.com    or @sherrywood